Your daily dose of Jordan Peterson

You need to hear him. The BBC interviewer interrupts constantly and it is obvious that nothing Peterson says fits her preconceived notions. Yet he calmly prevails. I wish I had as much precision of speech when under pressure.

Worth watching just to see how a careful answer can influence even a BBC interrogator. She interrupts, she fails to listen, she is disagreeable, she acts is unfair.  She projects madly from stuff she misinterprets. In fact, she argues like your wife, your girl friend.

He points out she has the right to be disagreeable, and that she is being disagreeable, and she agrees with him. So how come Jordan Peterson does not have the right to be disagreeable to radical leftist ideologues?

 

 

Bookmark and Share
Barry Thompson

Peterson is entirely the master of the situation. He re-frames her questions and usually does so in a way that is enlightening. She keeps trying to drag him back to the questions the social justice warriors use to identify enemies. She probably thinks that she holds the upper hand, intellectually. My emerging problem with Peterson is that he ends up with therapy and mythology.

Jeremy Jones

http://neoneocon.com/2018/01/20/all-hail-jordan-peterson-not-just-a-debater/

What Peterson does in that interview isn’t just on the order of what someone like Thomas Sowell (whom I also admire greatly) habitually does in argument, which is to counter the adversary on the cognitive and logical points, and to apply the results of research to the discussion. Peterson certainly does do that, and that’s what most people see when they watch that interview. But he adds certain techniques of the therapist and particularly of the family therapist (although I really don’t know if he’s done any family therapy; Peterson’s a psychologist and used to have a private practice as a therapist, however).

(rest of this long post at the link)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *