Jihad is a sacrament

When are people going to understand that for the pious Muslim, waging war for the advance of Islam is not some exceptional doctrine, but is as core to their beliefs as baptism, communion and the last rites are for Christians? What is so difficult for people to acknowledge this?

Inform yourselves, people.

Here is a  suggestion.

Here is another. Please note that,the constant bewailing that “Musllim lands are under attack” is the legal pretext for jihad.

Thirdly:

The ruling on physical jihad against the kaafirs is that this is an obligation on the community as a whole (fard kafaayah).

Ibn Qudaamah said:

“Jihaad is an obligation upon the community; if some people undertake it, the rest are relieved of the obligation.”

What fard kafaayah means is that if it is not undertaken by enough people, then all the people are guilty of sin, but if enough people undertakes it, the rest will be relieved of blame. Initially the command is addressed to all of them, as in the case of an individual obligation (fard ‘ayn), but then in the case of fard kafaayah the obligation is dropped if enough of the people undertake to do it, unlike the case with fard ‘ayn where the obligation is not dropped if someone else does it. Jihad is a fard kafaayah, according to the majority of scholars.”

(al-Mughni, 9/163)

 

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz said:

“We have previously explained on more than one occasion that jihad is fard kafaayah, not fard ‘ayn. All Muslims are enjoined to support their brothers with their selves (i.e., physically, by joining them), or with money, weapons, da’wah and advice. If enough of them go out (to fight), the rest are freed from sin, but if none of them do that then all of them are sinners.

The Muslims in Saudi Arabia, Africa, North Africa and elsewhere are obliged to do their utmost, and if there is a jihad in one country, the surrounding countries should hasten to help them, the closest then the next closest.  If one or two states, or three or more, manage to fulfil the obligation, then the rest are freed of responsibility. They deserve to be supported, and it is obligatory to help them against their enemies, because they are oppressed. Allaah has enjoined jihad upon all Muslims, and they must fight against the enemies of Allaah until their brothers are victorious. If they fail to do that then they are sinners, but if sufficient people undertake to do that, then the rest are absolved of sin.”

(Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz, 7/335)

Fourthly:

Physical jihad against the kaafirs becomes obligatory in four cases, which are:

1 – When the Muslim is present in a jihad situation.

2 – When the enemy has come and attacked a Muslim land

3 – When the ruler mobilizes the people, they must respond.

4 – When a person is needed and no one else can do the task except him.

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen said:

Jihad is obligatory and becomes fard ‘ayn if a person is present where fighting is going on. This is the first of the situations in which jihad becomes an individual obligation, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve, in a battlefield, never turn your backs to them.

And whoever turns his back to them on such a day — unless it be a stratagem of war, or to retreat to a troop (of his own), — he indeed has drawn upon himself wrath from Allaah. And his abode is Hell, and worst indeed is that destination!”

[al-Anfaal 8:16]

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said that running away on the day when the army is advancing is one of the sins that doom a person to Hell. He said: “Avoid the seven sins that doom a person to Hell…” among which he mentioned running away on the day when the army is advancing (agreed upon). But Allaah has made exceptions in two cases:

1-     When it is a military manoeuvre, in the sense that he is leaving to bring reinforcements.

2-     When he is going to join another group, when he has been told that there is a group of Muslims elsewhere who are about to be defeated, so he goes to join them in order to strengthen their numbers. This is subject to the condition that there is no risk to the group he is in; if there is a risk to the group that he is in, then it is not permissible for him to go to the other group. In this case (jihad) is an individual obligation upon him (fard ‘ayn) and it is not permissible for him to leave.

The second situation (in which jihad becomes an individual obligation) is when a city is besieged by the enemy. Then he has to fight in defence of the city, because when the city is besieged there is no alternative but to defend it, for if the enemy is going to prevent people from leaving the city or entering it, and prevent provisions from reaching it, and other things which are well known, then in this case the people of the city are obliged to fight in order to defend their city.

The third situation is when the leader tells the people to mobilize; the leader (imam) is the highest authority in the state, but he need not necessarily be the leader of all the Muslims, because there has been no leader of all the Muslims (khaleefah) for a long time. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Listen and obey, even if you are ruled by an Abyssinian slave.” So if a man becomes a leader, then his word is to be heeded and his commands are to obeyed.

(al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 8/10-12).

Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
Bookmark and Share
Bill

Yet once again America gets attacked and yet once again the people are blinded! Blinded by the fact that radical Islam is here to stay. Why? Cause the U.S. and Canada will not do a damn thing about it. After 9/11 America embraced the wonderful benevolent religion of Islam and opened her doors, hearts and citizenship to all the Islamic world, shamefully under the leadership of the greatest president in American history. Even after the Benghazi attacks president Obama and stupid looking Hilary apologized to the Muslim world for a dumb video.

Prime Minister Stephan Harper has stated on the public record that radical Islam is the number one threat to Canada’s national security and yet we have let in a record number of immigrants from Islamic countries that support jihad against the western world. In fact Canada has literally set the most pathetic example of appeasing radical Islam through the politically correct police and the fact that the government had failed to deport known terrorists living on Canadian soil. These known terrorists are considered just as Canadian as you and me despite the fact that they raise money for jihad, fight for the enemy killing coalition soldiers and openly pray for allah to destroy the Kuffar.

Great Britain has also embraced Islam despite the attacks of 7/7/05 just the same as many other European countries. Political correctness has been the fertilizer that has helped radical Islam grow in Canada, America and Europe. Furthermore, the concept of political correctness intimidates the media, law enforcement and everyday patriotic people such as myself who are branded as racists, xenophobic and Islamaphobic.

May God have mercy!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *