Really bad advice for young girls
January 3, 2010 7:59 am Life, Political Correctness, SportIn a recent advice column the issue concerned the tolerance of the housewife for her husband’s Playboys in the living room for the children to see. You can guess the tut-tutting from those guardians of morality. The readers were warned that dad’s Playboys might give the girls the false idea that their body image and their ability to satisfy a man sexually were of primary importance.
Well, actually…. they are. And anyone who denies it is in rampant denial fo the facts. The ability of the woman to satisfy a man sexually is absolutely primary. It is job #1. Sometimes it is the less immediate concern, such as when mum and dad are shopping for groceries, reading stories to the kids or cooking dinner. Work can interfere too. But over the long haul – especially if there is going to be a long haul – satisfying your man sexually is the job. Because if that is working out, everything else is working out. Sex life is the measure of the relationship.
And if you disagree with me, please go live somewhere else, preferably in a convent.
![[del.icio.us]](http://images.del.icio.us/static/img/delicious.small.gif){kind=small}
Dalwhinnie
The Grey lady :
Date: January 3, 2010 @ 9:28 AM
You are so right, because when I take stock of my 30 year relationship with my hubby the first thing I wonder is “are his rocks getting off in sufficient quantity and quality”?
terraderma :
Date: January 3, 2010 @ 11:02 AM
Isn’t that the way the Taliban view ‘their’ women as well? Soft little boys too are just as appreciated, we’re told.
And how long does your little woman have to put out for ‘Job # 1′? I’m guessing 15 secs (sic) max.
I disagree with you – whaddaya gonna do about it?
DavidA :
Date: January 3, 2010 @ 11:31 AM
100% correct, but it goes both ways for sure.
harebell :
Date: January 3, 2010 @ 6:38 PM
Terraderma
I think you’re giving them too much credit. These guys are conservative xtians and they seem prone to wide stances in toilets.
Dal
You do realise that you need someone else in the room before it can be called sex. Numbing your arm by laying on it doesn’t count.
Glendronach :
Date: January 4, 2010 @ 12:18 PM
So, Harebell, your idea of a refutation is to in effect yell “Fag!” at your opponent.
Somewhere out there a fifth grade gym class is missing its bully.
Wiseman :
Date: January 4, 2010 @ 4:32 PM
“satisfying your man sexually is the job. Because if that is working out, everything else is working out. Sex life is the measure of the relationship.”
Depends on whether the tits and the vag hold up. Otherwise, it could very well end up being the cooking and the cleaning, especially for those of us who’d rather spend time with our buds than pretend we’re interested in what *she* has to say anymore.
Dalwhinnie :
Date: January 7, 2010 @ 11:52 AM
To wiseman:
Point taken. I recommend the occasional divorce, if that is your level of interest in the old lady. Expensive but worth it. There are many sane and happy women out there awaiting sincere expressions of interest.
To terraderma:
20 minutes is usually sufficent, though not always. Sometimes more, seldom less. What about you? When I was in college, well, it was half the day, but none of us have that kind of time anymore.