Squeezing the Judiciary
March 28, 2009 American Politics No CommentsBy Arran Gold
One of the thoughts that was repeated often during the ascendancy of one Barrack Obama, was the he was unlikely to be able do much harm, because of checks and balances inherent in the US constitution. As Mark Styen notes “The Economist is the latest of the smart guys to notice that President Obama is proving strangely unlike the guy they told us he was back in late October.”
Putting that obvious fact aside, it is interesting to note the recent spate of attacks on the Supreme Court. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on Friday that Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. lied to Congress during his confirmation hearings by pretending to be open-minded about his judicial philosophy. Similarly, Sen. Barney Frank (D), whose sole private sector experience consists of the fact that his Washington residence was once used to operate a male-escort service by his live-in boyfriend while he was on Capitol Hill, attacked Justice Scalia for being a homophobe.
Is this an attempt by the executive and legislative branch to gang up on the judiciary and try to reduce its effectiveness, as it is the only branch of government that is not controlled by the Democrats?

