Anti-White Male and Proud of it
November 26, 2008 10:14 am Canadian Politics, CultureThere is a widespread belief that we are living in a more enlightened age than the nineteenth century. Then, the white, the male, and the Christian were thought to be superior, according to the modern interpretation of what they thought in the 19th century. Obviously they thought wrongly in the 19th century. Today, we hold ourselves so much more enlightened, because we believe the white, the male, and the Christian are inferior. Bad. Evil in fact – not that we feel comfortable with so judgmental a word as “evil”. But whiteness is the new blackness, according to the politically correct.
Take for instance the case of the students’ council of Carleton University of Ottawa. It has removed the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Association from the list of charitable organizations it will support with its efforts. Why?
According to them, cystic fibrosis is disproportionately a white male disease. Accordingly, it is not an appropriate concern.
“OTTAWA — The Carleton University Students’ Association has voted to drop a cystic fibrosis charity as the beneficiary of its annual Shinearama fundraiser, supporting a motion that argued the disease is not “inclusive” enough.
Cystic fibrosis “has been recently revealed to only affect white people, and primarily men” said the motion read Monday night to student councillors, who voted almost unanimously in favour of it.”
Is breast cancer inclusive enough? Is sickle cell anemia inclusive enough? Is prostate cancer inclusive enough?
The Carleton Students’ Council is set to reconsider the motion.
Racial, sexual, and religious hierarchies are not eliminated by inverting them.
A factual note
By googling incidence of cystic fibrosis, the following appears quickly.
“In the United States, the incidence of cystic fibrosis is highest in Whites of northern European ancestry (1 in 2,000 live births) and lowest in Blacks (1 in 17,000 live births), Native Americans, and people of Asian ancestry. The disease occurs equally in both sexes.”
Another entry reports that:
“We develop a statistical model for estimating cystic fibrosis (CF) incidence among infants born in the U.S.A. that accounts for under-diagnosis due to death prior to diagnosis and we apply it to the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry data for the years 1989 to 1991. The resulting estimate of incidence relative to live births among whites is 1:3419 while that among non-whites is 1:12,163. As a by-product of the modelling approach, estimates of the underlying average diagnosis age given survival to diagnosis are 409 years for whites and 455 years for non-whites, but this difference was not statistically significant and appears to demonstrate that diagnosis efforts may be approximately the same for whites and non-whites.”
As a final note, perhaps student council debates might be improved by access to the Internet.
Dalwhinnie

bubba brown :
Date: November 26, 2008 @ 11:32 AM
“student council debates might be improved by acess to the internet” do ya think ? Seems to this “old white guy” that my predecessors were screwed by being white and poor they orginated in Scotland and Ireland hauled his lordships water, cut his wood, tended his sheep, and died in his wars. It is no secret that .03 percent of the people in Britan controlled most of the wealth, and still do! and all the opportunity, you could not be an officer unless you could buy your commission, and had income from your estate. that was then, now these “revisionists” want to give “diversity” a leg up over “white privelege” and us “poor white folks” are being held to account for the colour of our skin, as though it was us that was “the lord of the manor” My Grandfather landed in Canada as an “orphan”in about 1900 he was about 9 or 10 and came from the slums of Glasgow. Of course his skin was white so somehow in the parallel universe these twerps inhabit his decendants are somehow guilty of something? WTF!! still getting screwed.
cheers Bubba
Kursk :
Date: November 26, 2008 @ 1:11 PM
I don’t feel guilty that it was predominately white christian males that dragged humanity into the industrial age.
Better standards of living, better lifestyle, longer life spans…advances in medicine, science,political theory, transportation, flight etc. etc..
Why should i feel sorry, or feel bad about any of the benefits of that, which have been passed down to every race, creed and colour?
They should build even more statues to these people, with a plaque at the bottom that states ‘you are a by product of the innovation,benevolence and generosity of white christian males, everywhere..’
Everett :
Date: January 26, 2009 @ 6:01 AM
I am not sorry for being a white male. As a matter of fact I am proud to be a white male.