Order of Canada governed by utter hypocrites

Canadian Politics 7 Comments

By Glendronach

In the eyes of Justice McLachlin and her co-ideologues on the nominating committee, “controversy” is a variable absolute:

McGill ethicist refused OC because she was ‘too controversial’

[...]

The Order’s receptiveness to new, taboo-breaking social mores was evident well before the Morgentaler appointment. The Order last year approved the candidacy of Brent Hawkes, a Toronto cleric who performed Canada’s first same-sex marriage. Also last year, the Order appointed writer Jane Vance Rule, lauding her specifically for “populating her novels with homosexual as well as heterosexual characters.” And when it honoured Jean Chrétien, the Order put a curious emphasis on his support for same-sex unions.

Few people, even critics of gay rights, made a fuss. I think most Canadians thought the Order was making an effort to reflect a significant current of public opinion. It’s hard to be against broad-mindedness.

Now, however, it suddenly turns out that the Order is not so broad-minded after all. It has refused admission to Margaret Somerville, the McGill University ethicist who is a leading critic of the social views that the Order welcomes.

And what does Ontario’s favourite Catholic schoolboy made good have to say about this? Don’t wait for the translation, Mr. McGuinty!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

The New Political State

American Politics, Economics and Finance No Comments

By Arran Gold

The socialist economist John Galbraith, in his 1967 book “The New Industrial State“, argued that large American corporation, such as General Motors, are essentially immune from market forces because they can use advertising to create additional demand. Nobody should ever confuse leftist economics with reality, as we have seen GM’s market share drop precipitiously, but that hasn’t stopped platitudes raining down on him.

Similar events could be unfolding in the political arena, where Obama is poised to raise $500 million. Since this fund raising projection was published on June 19, 2008, the events have unfolded which seem to indicated that Democrats are playing with Galbraith’s playbook. Eleanour Clift describes this 50-state strategy as follows:

Let’s do the math. If Obama holds all the Kerry states, he’s at 252. Add Iowa for 259. Add a win in Virginia or North Carolina, “and it’s game, set, match,” says Plouffe. Or add Colorado and New Mexico, Republican states where Obama now leads, to reach 270. The campaign last week put up a biographical ad in 18 states, including Alaska and Montana, historically Republican states. It looked like Obama was just trying to taunt McCain, lure him into spending money in states where he shouldn’t. But Plouffe insists “there’s not a head fake in the bunch.” Alaska’s octogenarian Sen. Ted Stephens, under investigation for corruption and the sponsor of the infamous “bridge to nowhere,” is in a tight race for reelection. Montana, which Bill Clinton won in ‘92, has a Democratic governor and senator.

And Plouffe is just getting started. There’s Georgia, a state that hasn’t gone Democratic since 1976, but the presence of former Georgia Rep. Bob Barr, who’s running for a third party—Libertarian—could drain 2 to 4 percent from McCain and put the state within reach for Obama. “Indiana is another place where I would ask you to reorder your thinking,” Plouffe said with clinical certainty, adding it to his list of states “behaving” more Democratic. “Our goal is to adjust the electorate more to our liking,” he said, explaining how registering a record number of African-Americans and young people under 40 could swell Democratic turnout and swing Republican-leaning states to Obama.

It looks as if Clift is expecting Obama to win 50 states in the upcoming Presidential election with the help of advertising strategy as described by Galbraith. Your correspondent is certainly glad that this will leave 7 states for McCain and the election won’t be a disaster for him, like 1984 was for Mondale, who only carried one state and the District of Columbia.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Triumph of Hope

American Politics No Comments

By Arran Gold

From NRO:

It’s like they’re trying to sell copies of Jonah’s book or something.

Perhaps it is the something.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]