<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Viral Eruption of &#8220;New Reform&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/05/29/on-the-viral-eruption-of-new-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/05/29/on-the-viral-eruption-of-new-reform/</link>
	<description>Over Proof Opinion, Smoothly Aged Insight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:59:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glendronach</title>
		<link>http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/05/29/on-the-viral-eruption-of-new-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Glendronach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrelstrength.com/?p=164#comment-625</guid>
		<description>To recap the gist of my posting, I am bothered by mutterings of pulling the stake out of the heart of the Reform Party of Canada. 

My only take on the Reform Party of Ontario is that it may not represent a winning political brand versus an actual conservative recapture of the provincial Progressive Conservative party. &lt;i&gt;Lori&lt;/i&gt; -- who I surmise must be a millennial -- trotted out the phrase &quot;A proud name, a proud tradition&quot;. That&#039;s a reasonable position if one&#039;s target demographic is the cluster of Ontario voters who drive Corvairs or Pintos, drink New Coke or own the DVD of &quot;Gigli&quot;. Rebuilding Ontario conservatism from Year Zero is no picnic, and I surmise one could do better for a tactical manual than &quot;The Leadership Secrets of Pol Pot&quot;. Ask one of the owners of the first edition, Preston Manning.

But that is a matter for Ontario conservatives to decide in the end. Just don&#039;t take the madness federal. You&#039;ve been warned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To recap the gist of my posting, I am bothered by mutterings of pulling the stake out of the heart of the Reform Party of Canada. </p>
<p>My only take on the Reform Party of Ontario is that it may not represent a winning political brand versus an actual conservative recapture of the provincial Progressive Conservative party. <i>Lori</i> &#8212; who I surmise must be a millennial &#8212; trotted out the phrase &#8220;A proud name, a proud tradition&#8221;. That&#8217;s a reasonable position if one&#8217;s target demographic is the cluster of Ontario voters who drive Corvairs or Pintos, drink New Coke or own the DVD of &#8220;Gigli&#8221;. Rebuilding Ontario conservatism from Year Zero is no picnic, and I surmise one could do better for a tactical manual than &#8220;The Leadership Secrets of Pol Pot&#8221;. Ask one of the owners of the first edition, Preston Manning.</p>
<p>But that is a matter for Ontario conservatives to decide in the end. Just don&#8217;t take the madness federal. You&#8217;ve been warned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Blogger - Friday, May 30th, 2008&#160;&#124;&#160;Jack&#8217;s Newswatch</title>
		<link>http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/05/29/on-the-viral-eruption-of-new-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Blogger - Friday, May 30th, 2008&#160;&#124;&#160;Jack&#8217;s Newswatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrelstrength.com/?p=164#comment-624</guid>
		<description>[...] Barrel Strength &#124; On the Viral Eruption of “New Reform” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barrel Strength | On the Viral Eruption of “New Reform” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/05/29/on-the-viral-eruption-of-new-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrelstrength.com/?p=164#comment-623</guid>
		<description>1) and attempt was made to remove Tory at the last convention where he only got 67% approval.  The convention was very rigged by Tory and he still only got 67%.  For example, over 80 people had their delegate status revoked when they got there.  These people were overwhelmingly anti-Tory.  If they had been allowed to vote his numbers would have been bellow 60%.  

2) many of us believe that Tory won&#039;t win in 2011 with or without Reform around, so if it&#039;s gonna be a Liberal victory anyway, why not go with Reform?

3) Even if Reform isn&#039;t a serious option, it may have the effect of scaring the crap out of the PCs and causing them to take a hard look at their party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) and attempt was made to remove Tory at the last convention where he only got 67% approval.  The convention was very rigged by Tory and he still only got 67%.  For example, over 80 people had their delegate status revoked when they got there.  These people were overwhelmingly anti-Tory.  If they had been allowed to vote his numbers would have been bellow 60%.  </p>
<p>2) many of us believe that Tory won&#8217;t win in 2011 with or without Reform around, so if it&#8217;s gonna be a Liberal victory anyway, why not go with Reform?</p>
<p>3) Even if Reform isn&#8217;t a serious option, it may have the effect of scaring the crap out of the PCs and causing them to take a hard look at their party</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/05/29/on-the-viral-eruption-of-new-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrelstrength.com/?p=164#comment-622</guid>
		<description>Well, the Ontario Conservative movement is lost anyway.  

If libs win an election, we have the libs setting policy.

If the conservatives win an election.... we have libs setting policy just the same.

Either way libs romp unopposed. 

At least if the opposition is Reform, there will be a voice for conservatism. 

So what&#039;s to lose by backing Ontario Reform?  A proud name, a proud tradition, and frankly I would seriously think of supporting the party. I&#039;m  a member of the CPC, but I see nothing in the current Ontario PC  party that I like. 

Seriously, what&#039;s to lose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Ontario Conservative movement is lost anyway.  </p>
<p>If libs win an election, we have the libs setting policy.</p>
<p>If the conservatives win an election&#8230;. we have libs setting policy just the same.</p>
<p>Either way libs romp unopposed. </p>
<p>At least if the opposition is Reform, there will be a voice for conservatism. </p>
<p>So what&#8217;s to lose by backing Ontario Reform?  A proud name, a proud tradition, and frankly I would seriously think of supporting the party. I&#8217;m  a member of the CPC, but I see nothing in the current Ontario PC  party that I like. </p>
<p>Seriously, what&#8217;s to lose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
