Barrel Strength

The Richardwarman.com website has transcripts from the Commission hearings.
In this one, the good stuff starts at page 1377, line 10.

In this, the lack of documentation cited below seems to clap a stopper on one line of questioning. However, it seems highly probable that Warman did indeed make the Cools posting and it may be possible to prove it. As a member of the Rules, Procedures and Rights of Parliament Committee, Sen. Cools may be able to bring people to account in a real court.<!–[if !supportEmptyParas]–>

2 MR. WARMAN: Sorry, just in the<!–[endif]–>

3 interests of this issue, I can state right now that

4 paragraph 3 of the material that has been provided to

5 me, of the affidavit states that,

6 “The network security department

7 has conducted a search to

8 retrieve the customer account

9 information relating to the IP

10 address for the date listed, and

11 we found that the information is

12 no longer available. The length

13 of time has surpassed the

14 retention period of our laws.”

<!–[if !supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>

One blogger serves up a detailed account of how proceedings under Section 13 of the Canadian Human  Rights Act are being conducted by unlawful means, to the extent of being unconstitutional.