<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ezra Levant and You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/01/17/ezra-levant-and-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/01/17/ezra-levant-and-you/</link>
	<description>Over Proof Opinion, Smoothly Aged Insight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:57:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paolo</title>
		<link>http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/01/17/ezra-levant-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrelstrength.com/2008/01/17/ezra-levant-and-you/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I quite like your barrelstrength site.  Imaginative.

I don&#039;t know where you got the false idea that I have the false idea
that the Danish cartoons were intended to be a provocation -- it&#039;s not
at all what I said on Thurs evening. Among the things that I did say,
which was disputed by Balvenie and DarkLord, was that the (initial 3, I
think) cartoons originated in a newspaper in Egypt/Cairo and were
simply reprinted by the Danish newspaper explicitly as something that
had already been published in the muslim world, but to which several
more cartoons were added. I would welcome an authoritative account
saying otherwise, but pro tem I stand by this account that I know is
significantly different from the prevailing version.  I learned of it
a few weeks after the Copenhagen firestorm and upon checking, found
its veracity to be acceptable.

I concur, of course, that we must stand in any way necessary against
those who challenge/threaten the foundations of our worldview and
social order. A fight of some kind is unavoidable. I sense, however,
that in the ebb and flow of civilizations and epochs, the pinnacle of
ours was reached somewhere around 1985-1990 and that we can expect
retrograde change for at least some centuries to come.  Which means
among many things that there will be a shrinking core of our society
strong enough to know that they must fight, and will, and wise enough
to know how, even understanding that it will be a rearguard action and
will occur in the face of shrinking support for the fight from the
affluence-anaesthetized masses.  Pity.  Perhaps some will
(necessarily) find comfort and strength in believing that God is on
their side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite like your barrelstrength site.  Imaginative.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where you got the false idea that I have the false idea<br />
that the Danish cartoons were intended to be a provocation &#8212; it&#8217;s not<br />
at all what I said on Thurs evening. Among the things that I did say,<br />
which was disputed by Balvenie and DarkLord, was that the (initial 3, I<br />
think) cartoons originated in a newspaper in Egypt/Cairo and were<br />
simply reprinted by the Danish newspaper explicitly as something that<br />
had already been published in the muslim world, but to which several<br />
more cartoons were added. I would welcome an authoritative account<br />
saying otherwise, but pro tem I stand by this account that I know is<br />
significantly different from the prevailing version.  I learned of it<br />
a few weeks after the Copenhagen firestorm and upon checking, found<br />
its veracity to be acceptable.</p>
<p>I concur, of course, that we must stand in any way necessary against<br />
those who challenge/threaten the foundations of our worldview and<br />
social order. A fight of some kind is unavoidable. I sense, however,<br />
that in the ebb and flow of civilizations and epochs, the pinnacle of<br />
ours was reached somewhere around 1985-1990 and that we can expect<br />
retrograde change for at least some centuries to come.  Which means<br />
among many things that there will be a shrinking core of our society<br />
strong enough to know that they must fight, and will, and wise enough<br />
to know how, even understanding that it will be a rearguard action and<br />
will occur in the face of shrinking support for the fight from the<br />
affluence-anaesthetized masses.  Pity.  Perhaps some will<br />
(necessarily) find comfort and strength in believing that God is on<br />
their side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

